Revision Knee Replacement Engagement Summary

  • Published: 19 May 2020
  • Version: V1
  • 1 min read

Gathering uncertainties

Methods used (e.g. survey, focus groups, interviews):

Online and paper survey, recruitment help via PPI groups in regional centres

Number %
Total respondents (across all methods) 294 100%
Total patients and carers / spouses 137/34 50 %/12%
Total health and care professionals 123 46%
Total number of original uncertainties submitted 769 100%
Original uncertainties in scope 642 83%
Original uncertainties out of scope 127 17%

Interim prioritisation

Methods used (eg survey, focus groups, interviews):

Ranking survey – online and paper

Number %
Total number of indicative questions (answered & unanswered) 32 100
Number of verified answered questions nil -
Number of verified unanswered questions 32 100
Number of verified unanswered questions included in the interim prioritisation 32
Total respondents (across all methods) 201 100
Total patients and carers 100 50
Total health and care professionals 101 50
Number of questions taken to final workshop 25

Final priority setting workshop

Number %
Total participants 24 100
Total patients and carers 12 50
Total health and care professionals 12 50

Notes:

On initial survey respondents could declare both personal and professional experiences of problematic knee replacement – e.g. a physiotherapist or surgeon with additional experience as a carer hence sum of numbers > 100%